; Here are the latest results for HE0107-5240, as (mostly)
; presented in Seattle:

;            1D    3D    sigma
; [C/Fe]     +3.9  +2.9  0.2
; 12C/13C      60    60   10
; [N/Fe]     +2.7  +1.7  0.2
; [O/Fe]     +2.6  +1.9  0.2
; [Mg/Fe]    +0.6  +0.5  0.2
; [Ti/Fe]    +0.3  +0.2  0.2
; [Sc/Fe]    +0.2  +0.1  0.2
; [FeI/H]LTE -5.4  -5.6  0.1
; [FeII/H]   -5.7  -5.7  0.2
; [Co/Fe]    +0.7  +0.5  0.2
; [Ni/Fe]    +0.1   0.2  0.1

; Attached is a file containing more information, including
; the log epsilon values, the solar abundances that I used
; (i.e., those of Asplund, Grevesse & Sauval 2005), a
; comparison with previous results, and an upper limit for
; Cr. I have not included Cr into the above table because no
; 3D correction for Cr II is currently available, and Cr I
; most likely suffers from NLTE.

; In principle I can also provide you with slightly improved
; upper limits for Sr and Ba, but that paper will be published
; only next year or so... So, let me know if you need this.

; Note that in contrast to HE1327-2326 (where no Fe II lines
; are detected) the Fe II abundance should be used for
; HE0107-5240. And in all cases the 3D abundances are closer
; to reality than the 1D abundances. Note also that although
; the above values are very close to the final ones, I still
; need to do a couple of final checks of my abundance
; analysis, and if it turns out that something went wrong, the
; values might change by amounts of up to 0.1 dex or so. I'll
; keep you posted.

; For these results, please cite Christlieb et al. (2006, ApJ,
; submitted). The paper is actually not yet submitted, but it
; WILL be soon -- hopefully before you submit your paper  :) 
; Concerning the 3D corrections, please cite Collet et
; al. (2006, ApJ 644, L121).

; I am looking forward to learning more about your results,
; and especially where in the "physically reasonable parameter
; space" you can achieve high C/Fe and O/Fe ratios (what about
; N/Fe, by the way?). I (and I guess also Anna) would be more
; than happy to comment on the draft of the paper in which you
; make use of the abundances we provided you with.

; Cheers,

; Norbert.

; Z  El  Ion N  abund  sigma Sun  [X/H]  [X/Fe] Comment
;  -- --- --- -- ------ ----- ---- ------ ------ ---------------------------------------
;   6  C           7.11  0.1  8.39  -1.28  +4.39 From C_2
;   6  C           6.81  0.1  8.39  -1.58  +4.09 From CH-AX
; * 6  C           6.66  0.05 8.39  -1.73  +3.94 Moderately strong CH-CX lines 3200-3220
; * 6  C                                   +2.85 3D

;   7  N           4.93  0.1  7.78  -2.85  +2.82 From CN, assuming C=7.11
;   7  N           5.22  0.1  7.78  -2.56  +3.11 From CN, assuming C=6.81
; * 7  N           4.85       8.05  -3.20  +2.20 NH/M.S.B./SYNTHE/[Fe/H]=-5.4
; * 7  N           4.85?      7.78  -2.93  +2.74 NH/[Fe/H]=-5.67
; * 7  N                                   +1.69 3D

;   8  O           5.66       8.66  -3.00  +2.30 Bessell et al. (2004)/[Fe/H]=-5.3
;   8  0           5.93       8.93  -3.00  +2.40 M.S.B./SYNTHE/[Fe/H]=-5.4
; * 8  O           5.62  0.1  8.66  -3.04  +2.63 N.C./MARCS/[Fe/H]=-5.67
; * 8  O                                   +1.92 3D 

;  12  Mg 1    2   2.41  0.04 7.53  -5.12  +0.55
; *12  Mg 1    3   2.44  0.05 7.53  -5.09  +0.58
; *12  Mg 1                                +0.50 3D

;  21  Sc 2    1 <-1.50       3.05 <-4.55 <+1.12 (3613.829A)
; *21  Sc 2    2  -2.43       3.05  -5.48  +0.19 
; *21  Sc 2                                +0.06 3D

;  22  Ti 2    5  -0.62  0.08 4.90  -5.52  +0.15
; *22  Ti 2   18  -0.50  0.14 4.90  -5.40  +0.27
; *22  Ti 2                                +0.23 3D

;  23  V  2    1  <1.08       4.00 <-2.92 <+2.75 (3951.96A)
; *23  V  2    1  <XXXX       4.00               (3110.700) TO BE DETERMINED
; *23  V  2    1  <XXXX       4.00               (3125.276) TO BE DETERMINED

;  24  Cr 1    1  <0.65       5.64 <-4.99 <+0.68 (4254.332A)
; *24  Cr 2    1  <0.50       5.64 <-5.14 <+0.53 (3132.053A) 3D correction??

;  26  Fe 1   25   2.06  0.03 7.45  -5.39     
;  26  Fe 1                         -5.28        1D NLTE/old
; *26  Fe 1   28   2.05  0.11 7.45  -5.40        1D LTE/new
; *26  Fe 1                         -5.29        1D NLTE/new
;  26  Fe 2    1  <3.00       7.45 <-4.45        (5018.440A)  
; *26  Fe 2        1.72  0.20 7.45  -5.73        Fe II 3227/1D LTE
; *26  Fe 2                         -5.67        3D LTE <= adopted Fe abundance

;  27  Co 1    1  <0.86       4.92 <-4.06 <+1.61 (3453.508A)
; *27  Co 1    2  -0.03  0.10 4.92  -4.95  +0.72 
; *27  Co 1                                +0.46 3D

;  28  Ni 1    4   0.60  0.01 6.23  -5.63  +0.04
; *28  Ni 1   17   0.64  0.11 6.23  -5.59  +0.08
; *28  Ni 1                                -0.23 3D
;  -- --- --- -- ------ ----- ---- ------ ------ ---------------------------------------

; New results, derived from the UV spectrum, are marked with an asterisk. They
; were computed with the model 5100g2.2z-5.40m1.0t2A and a microturbulence of
; 1.6 km/s.

; For computations of [X/Fe], we use [Fe/H]=-5.67.


; Summary of current best values; trustworthy results only; 3D corrections
; applied where available:

;  Z  El  Ion 3Dcorr [X/Fe] Comment
;  -- --- --- ------ ------ -------
;   6  C       -1.09  +2.85 CH
;   7  N       -1.05  +1.69 NH
;   8  O       -0.71  +1.92 OH
;  12  Mg 1    -0.08  +0.50 
;  22  Ti 2    -0.04  +0.23 
;  24  Cr 2          <+0.53 1D
;  26  Fe 2    +0.06  -5.67 
;  27  Co 1    -0.26  +0.46 
;  28  Ni 1    -0.31  -0.23 
;  -- --- --- ------ ------ -------


; The results that I previously sent you were based on
; newer and better spectra of HE0107 which cover the UV,
; but not the Na D lines. However, you could use the
; Na abundance previously published by us. Converted
; to the same scale (in terms of solar abundances and
; the iron abundance adopted for HE0107) as the other
; abundances I sent you, this would be:
;
;            1D    3D    sigma
; [Na/Fe]    +1.4  +1.3  0.2
;
; Cheers,
;
; Norbert.

;-----------------------------------------------------------------------
;ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
;-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRO he0107data, data

@compile_opt

ndata=12
data=REPLICATE({he0107,el:'',z:0,FeH:0.0D0,abu:0.0D0,sigma:0.0D0},ndata)

data[*].el=[$
             'C', $
             'N', $
             'O', $
             'Na', $
             'Mg', $
             'Sc', $
             'Ti', $
             'V', $
             'Cr', $
             'Fe', $
             'Co', $
             'Ni']

; data relative fe with [Fe/H]=
feh=-5.67

data[*].feh=[$
              +2.85, $          ; C  
              +1.69, $          ; N 
              +1.92, $          ; O 
              +1.30, $          ; Na
              +0.50, $          ; Mg
              +0.06, $          ; Sc
              +0.23, $          ; Ti
              +2.75, $          ; V 
              +0.53, $          ; Cr
               0.00, $          ; Fe
              +0.46, $          ; Co
              -0.23]            ; Ni

; indicate upper limits using negaitiev sigma, say -1

data[*].sigma=[$
                0.20, $  ; C 
                0.20, $  ; N 
                0.20, $  ; O 
                0.20, $  ; Na
                0.20, $  ; Mg
                0.20, $  ; Sc
                0.20, $  ; Ti
                -0.2, $  ; V 
                -0.2, $  ; Cr
                0.20, $  ; Fe
                0.20, $  ; Co
                0.10]    ; Ni


@elements
data[*].z=string2z(data[*].el)


@solabu_var
solabu

data.abu=data.feh+feh

end